Enhancing Integrity: How to credibly bring REDD+ into international carbon markets under Article 6.2
The Warsaw Framework for REDD+ provides an important framework for international cooperation on forest conservation recognised in Article 5.2 of the Paris Agreement. However, while funding REDD+ through market-based approaches was potentially allowed, the WFR required additional criteria to be developed to ensure carbon markets’ environmental integrity. While Article 6.4 rules specify a detailed set of principles and criteria that activities need to satisfy before they can get registered, Article 6.2 only provides high-level integrity principles for cooperative approaches, with countries having the ultimate authority to operationalise these. Therefore, Perspectives suggests using PACM as a benchmark for REDD+ arrangements under Article 6.2, as it establishes stricter requirements than the different VCM programmes. This is a precondition for increasing trust in REDD+ credits. Permitting a direct link between Article 5.2 and Article 6.2 without extra requirements would be wholly inconsistent with the principles of Article 6 and should be avoided. Article published in Carbon Mechanisms Review "From Framework to Action: fostering high-integrity carbon markets after the Baku breakthrough", Spring 2025.
More from these authors
Reversal risk and buffer pool contribution analysis
Assessing the effectiveness of Voluntary Carbon Market Grievance Mechanisms
Assessing the robustness of Carbon Market Grievance Mechanisms and recommendations for the establishment of an Article 6.4 Grievance Mechanism
Keep reading